Users
There have been 437 (270 females) players, have been employed through in public places accessible social networking sites. Its suggest ages try 23 many years (SD = 5.96). Players had been requested to accomplish a collection of forms a few of that are not related on newest studies. All of the sufferers offered the advised consent into launch of the attempt ratings for search purposes, and all was indeed considering viewpoints on general outcome of the study. The dataset analysed from inside the latest data is obtainable at the
Procedures
Insecure narcissism try counted into Hypersensitive Narcissism Level because of the Hendin and you will Cheek (1997) regarding the Polish translation (look for Czarna et al. 2014). They contains 10 facts with an excellent Likert-eg effect size from (firmly differ) in order to 5 (highly agree).
Grandiose narcissism try reviewed toward verified Shine variation (Bazinska and you will Drat-Ruszczak 2000) of your own Narcissistic Character List (Raskin and you may Hallway 1979). Those things was indeed selected basing toward foundation research (loadings surpassing .40) and you can illustrated the second subscales of one’s NPI: Expert (eleven situations), Self-Sufficiency (7), Vanity (5), and you may Exhibitionism (11). Participants rated its standard of approval of every report using an excellent Likert-type impulse structure, from (will not apply to me) so you’re able to 5 (applies to me). The sum issues brings a catalog out-of grandiose narcissism. This has been revealed has just that Likert format NPI manifests similar construct legitimacy and you may quite enhanced accuracy with the brand-new pressed-options structure (Miller mais aussi al. 2018a).
The major Five is actually reviewed that have Shine version (Strus mais aussi al. 2014) of one’s Around the world Personality Goods Pond – Larger Five Factor Measure (BFAS; DeYoung et al. 2007). That is a 100-product way of measuring characteristic domains (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and you may Visibility/Intellect) plus the a couple lower-order aspects of for every single website name (Volatility, Withdrawal, internationalcupid coupon Mercy, Complimentary, Industriousness, Orderliness, Enthusiasm, Assertiveness, Intelligence, and you can Visibility). Players try asked in order to speed how much the comments are associated on it into the a beneficial Likert-method of scale, in one (strongly disagree) so you’re able to 5 (firmly consent).
Performance
Very first, i tested the correlations ranging from one or two alternatives of narcissism and you may identification traits together with domain names and you may points (Table step one). One another sorts of narcissism synchronised with characteristics in the an identical answer to past search (age.grams. Miller et al. 2011). Especially, vulnerable narcissism is actually seriously coordinated with Neuroticism, and you can adversely of this Agreeableness and you can Extraversion. Grandiose narcissism coordinated definitely having Extraversion, Openness/Intellect and you will Conscientiousness, and you may negatively with Neuroticism and you may Agreeableness.
Subsequently, we compared the associations between each type of narcissism and aspects of personality within each domain. Therefore, we tested for the difference between two dependent correlations (Steiger 1980). Figure 1 illustrates graphically the patterns of correlations. We found that vulnerable narcissism was significantly and positively correlated with both aspects of Neuroticism and that correlations did not differ from one another (z =,215, p = 0.820), which supported H1. In addition, consistent with H2, grandiose narcissism was significantly and negatively correlated with Withdrawal, and this correlation was stronger than with Volatility (z = 5.85, p < 0.001). Grandiose narcissism correlated positively with both aspects of Extraversion; however, the association was stronger for Assertiveness (z = , p < 0.001), which supported H3. Vulnerable narcissism was equally negatively related to both Assertiveness and Enthusiasm (z = ?1.90; p = 0.060; H4). The results also supported H5; grandiose narcissism was negatively correlated with both aspects of Agreeableness. However, the correlation with Politeness was significantly stronger (z = 6.26; p < 0.001). The correlation of vulnerable narcissism with both aspects of Agreeableness was negative and the magnitudes of these correlations were similar (z = .261; p = 0.79). Thus, H6 was only partially supported, because we expected a higher association with Compassion. Finally, H7 was also supported: grandiose narcissism correlated positively with Intellect and this association was stronger than with Openness (z = 7.40; p < 0.001).